Even the US Congress wants to know who brought down Bolojan
Gregory Meeks, the top Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, sent an official letter to Secretary of State Marco Rubio asking whether the US government was involved in bringing down the government of Romanian Prime Minister Ilie Bolojan, as Kimberly Guilfoyle, the US ambassador to Greece, reportedly claimed according to the Wall Street Journal — Meeks is expecting a reply and the requested documents by October 15. The Democratic congressman is asking whether the WSJ report is accurate that the ambassador essentially said the United States had participated in the fall of the Romanian government and could do the same in Greece. If so, he wants to know what Guilfoyle based this on, and whether the State Department, the White House, the National Security Council or any other US agency authorized or directed activities aimed at influencing the composition or survival of the Romanian government.
Meeks also wants to know when the department learned of the ambassador's remarks, whether she was reprimanded for them, and whether the Romanian and Greek governments were contacted about the matter. The letter also includes an extensive document request covering records generated since September 2025, including the ambassador's official trips to Romania, Bulgaria and Albania; whether private individuals or companies provided her with transportation; the department's ethics guidance regarding the ambassador's private business interests; and all records related to the Greek Aktor Group, its LNG business lines, its head Alexandros Exarchos, and lobbyist Christos Marafatsos, who is close to the ambassador. This list alone says more about the ambassador's diplomatic work than any press release ever could.
According to the WSJ, on March 18, at a dinner at the US embassy in Athens attended by the Greek energy minister, Guilfoyle said that the Bolojan government would soon fall because it stood in the way of American energy interests, adding that this could be done to any country. On March 31, the ambassador had dinner at a restaurant in Bucharest with PSD chairman Sorin Grindeanu, then-Energy Minister Bogdan Ivan, and presidential adviser Bogdan Vlădică. Bolojan had refused to buy expensive American liquefied natural gas, and his government was brought down on May 5 by a no-confidence motion backed by the PSD, AUR and other lawmakers. Grindeanu and AUR chairman George Simion told G4Media that they had not discussed bringing down the government with the ambassador, while Guilfoyle's lawyer denies the WSJ's account.
Meanwhile, the State Department's inspector general has opened an investigation into the ambassador over a separate matter, after a Trump donor alleged that she asked him to pay off her $100,000 credit card debt in exchange for securing him access to the top echelons of the administration. Just days ago, Rubio called her an extremely effective diplomat, while Trump said over the weekend only that it was too bad, that he didn't know much about the matter, but that the ambassador had always been very nice. So the American president knows just as much about his own ambassadors as he does about the Romanian government crisis: essentially nothing — but she's always nice.
The story has a particular irony to it: in February 2025, it was US Vice President JD Vance who lectured Europe in Munich, saying that the Romanian Constitutional Court had made a mockery of democracy by annulling a presidential election suspected of Russian interference. A year and a half later, one of the American government's own ambassadors is boasting at a dinner in Athens that Washington can bring down the government of any country it chooses.
Ugar
Did you like this article?
Support our work with a small donation
Secure payment via Stripe • Min. 2 EUR
Gesta recommendations:

Russia has won, and it's time we finally understood this
Yes, that's how it is: Russia and Putin have won. Not on the front, where after four and a half years it still has not managed to break Ukraine, and where it has cost the Kremlin roughly one and a half million soldiers killed and wounded just to plant its flag over a few ruined towns. Moscow has not won the war of tanks. But the war it is waging not against Ukraine but against Europe and the West…

Sixteen hundred names on the blacklist: what does the EU's largest-ever sanctions decision against Russia contain?
On October 12, in Luxembourg, the foreign ministers of the European Union's member states added nearly 1,600 Russian individuals and companies to the sanctions list. This is the largest single expansion since the war began, and it targets participants in Russia's military industry, particularly the production chains for drones and ballistic missiles. Kaja Kallas, the EU's High Representative for…

Majority of Germans back Ukraine, AfD camp backs Moscow
Nearly two-thirds of Germans would maintain or increase European countries' military support for Ukraine, according to Germany's public broadcaster ZDF's latest Politbarometer survey. According to the poll by Forschungsgruppe Wahlen, 30 percent of respondents want stronger military support, 33 percent favor keeping the current level, and another 33 percent would reduce arms deliveries. ZDF…

Fresh, hot off the press and sufficiently stupid: this is what a textbook Russian fake news story looks like
A genuine, unadulterated Russian fake news story has arrived — fresh, hot off the press, and just stupid enough to be worth sharing with our readers. Citing information from an unnamed woman serving in the Russian armed forces — how fortunate that in Romanian the word for soldier also carries gender, otherwise we wouldn't even know that much about the source — Russian channels report that Kyiv is…

After two decades of a language war: what does Ukraine's minority education law mean for ethnic Hungarians in Transcarpathia?
On October 12, the Ukrainian parliament, the Verkhovna Rada, passed law no. 16119, which guarantees the educational rights of national minorities and indigenous peoples. According to reports by UNIAN and Ukrinform, 266 lawmakers supported the bill, even though a majority of the constitutional 450 seats – that is, 226 votes – would have been enough for it to pass. Because of the war and the…